- DXO PURERAW VS TOPAZ DENOISE SOFTWARE
- DXO PURERAW VS TOPAZ DENOISE ISO
- DXO PURERAW VS TOPAZ DENOISE SERIES
If you’re interested in learning more about demosaicing and how our cameras work, I recommend the following links: DxO PureRAW promises to deliver superior results in interpreting the RAW data so that we start with great colors right out of the box. Put simply, demosaicing is the process by which the missing color data from our sensor’s photo sites (each pixel on the sensor records only a red, green, or blue value) is interpolated in order to produce a full-color RAW file. I promise to spend it on good coffee for me and my family 😀😀įirst, there’s the demosaicing process. Just click the banner below to pay the discounted price while also throwing me a little commission to reward me for my efforts in sharing my thoughts. Read on to learn why but, if you want to purchase it by May 31, 2021, you can save 30%. But, DxO PureRAW is simple to use and quite amazing I am definitely making it a part of my current and future workflow. I just hate cluttering my catalog with different copies of my master files.
DXO PURERAW VS TOPAZ DENOISE SOFTWARE
I’m not big on jumping on any software bandwagon, especially when it complicates my tight Lightroom/RAW file as master workflow. Topaz Denoise AI and DxO PureRAW are simply different tools for different jobs (with a bit of overlap in the telephoto realm). That’s not a knock on Topaz Denoise AI it’s a great program, and it shines for its best use case. If you compare Topaz Denoise AI with DxO PureRAW for all of these kinds of images, you’re now comparing apples to oranges!ĭxO PureRAW offers a wide range of benefits for the all-around nature photographer whereas Topaz Denoise AI is useful for removing noise and adding sharpening for traditional telephoto nature portraiture. I shoot everything in nature including some telephoto birds and wildlife but also daytime landscapes, night landscapes, wide angle wildlife, macro subjects, camera trap and remote wildlife setups, and even aerial landscapes with drones. DxO PureRAW may not offer you much benefit.īut, if you shoot a wide variety of nature photography subjects and styles, then DxO PureRAW definitely deserves your attention. If you are primarily a bird photographer and currently own and like Topaz Denoise AI, then by all means, stick with it. Both do an amazing job at removing noise where necessary while enhancing the details in bird feathers. Comparing DxO PureRAW with Topaz Denoise AI for bird photography with telephoto lenses makes sense.
DXO PURERAW VS TOPAZ DENOISE ISO
Specifically, though it doesn’t tend to work well for night landscapes, Topaz Denoise AI is fantastic for photos taken with telephoto lenses at high ISO values - think classic bird photography portraits or flight shots.Īnd I think that’s where the confusion comes in because nature photography is more than just telephoto work. I’ve not found Topaz Sharpen AI to be very useful but Topaz Denoise AI can indeed make big improvements for certain images. I’ve done video and blog reviews of those products previously and found that Topaz Denoise AI in particular worked quite well for certain types of photos. I received a number of comments on my YouTube video reviews of DxO PureRAW that referenced Topaz Denoise AI and/or Topaz Sharpen AI. If you have some time and want to really get into how I evaluated DxO PureRAW for my own varied style of nature photography, grab a drink and settle in! As with this blog post, the video considers the potential for DxO PureRAW to provide better RAW images for a variety of nature photography scenarios. Check it out below to get into some serious detail and to learn a few processing tips and tricks along the way.
I produced a big video review for my YouTube channel.
That sounded good to me so I downloaded a copy to try it out. So, when I became aware of DxO’s new PureRAW software, I was interested to see what the new software might have to offer.ĭxO PureRAW promises to give us the best version of our RAW files through pre-processing so that we can then get back to our regular workflow to produce awesome images. But I imagine that there are a lot of us out there who are generally happy with Lightroom and Photoshop and, even more importantly, don’t want to make the huge time investment needed to completely overhaul our workflow. If you’ve done so and are happy moving away from Adobe that’s great. I can understand that desire, but I have no interest in switching over to a completely different catalog and workflow system. For this reason, some photographers have been looking at full-scale Lightroom replacements such as Capture One, DxO PhotoLab, On1, and others. Among them is Lightroom’s difficulty in extracting the best colors, noise profiles, and sharpness from our RAW files.
DXO PURERAW VS TOPAZ DENOISE SERIES
Though I’m a longtime Lightroom user (I even produced the popular e-book and video series Lightroom for the Nature Photographer with my good friend Keith Bauer), it’s common knowledge that Lightroom has some limitations.
0 kommentar(er)
